PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPX vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPX vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


QPX

1D
-0.66%
1M
7.22%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.56%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
10.87%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%0.38%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and COMT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

0.11

The correlation between QPX and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QPX vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPX
COMT

Technology

49.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

25.6%

-

Communication Services

14.9%

-

Real Estate

6.4%

-

Industrials

1.0%

-

Financial Services

0.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Technology

QPX
49.8%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

QPX
25.6%
COMT

-

Communication Services

QPX
14.9%
COMT

-

Real Estate

QPX
6.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

QPX
1.0%
COMT

-

Financial Services

QPX
0.9%
COMT
100.0%

Healthcare

QPX
0.6%
COMT

-

Energy

QPX
0.3%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

QPX
0.3%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

QPX
0.2%
COMT

-

Utilities

QPX
0.1%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPX vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QPXCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

5.95

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

14.11

-2.92

QPX vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPXCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.20

+0.47

Drawdowns

QPX vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPXCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-51.89%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-8.02%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-13.31%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-29.00%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-4.82%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-24.07%

+16.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.38%

-0.48%

Volatility

QPX vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.16%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPXCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

7.37%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

18.80%

-7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

21.29%

-7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

21.06%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

18.89%

+1.10%

QPX vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPX vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QPX and COMT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to QPX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 13.04% for QPX. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 0.48% for COMT.

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPX and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer