PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QOWZ vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QOWZ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


QOWZ

1D
-1.13%
1M
6.39%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QOWZ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
-1.71%7.24%33.16%6.47%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QOWZ and SPY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.86

The correlation between QOWZ and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QOWZ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QOWZ
SPY

Technology

57.9%
35.9%

Industrials

12.4%
7.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.5%
11.3%

Financial Services

5.1%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

QOWZ
57.9%
SPY
35.9%

Industrials

QOWZ
12.4%
SPY
7.8%

Healthcare

QOWZ
9.8%
SPY
8.4%

Communication Services

QOWZ
8.5%
SPY
11.3%

Financial Services

QOWZ
5.1%
SPY
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QOWZ
4.1%
SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

QOWZ
2.1%
SPY
4.8%

Basic Materials

QOWZ

-

SPY
1.8%

Energy

QOWZ

-

SPY
3.6%

Real Estate

QOWZ

-

SPY
1.9%

Utilities

QOWZ

-

SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QOWZ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QOWZ
QOWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QOWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QOWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QOWZ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QOWZSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.43

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

3.16

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

14.72

-14.29

QOWZ vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QOWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QOWZ and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QOWZSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.38

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.59

+0.33

Drawdowns

QOWZ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QOWZSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-55.19%

+34.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.81%

-8.88%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-0.70%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-9.05%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

1.91%

+4.79%

Volatility

QOWZ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that QOWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QOWZSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

2.84%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

8.90%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

11.83%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.05%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.94%

+1.33%

QOWZ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QOWZ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
0.26%0.28%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QOWZ and SPY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QOWZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 1-year performance, SPY leads with 27.98% vs 2.83% for QOWZ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPY has performed better with a 27.98% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.26% for QOWZ.

QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QOWZ and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer