QOWZ vs. VFLO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned -0.39% vs 46.76% for VFLO. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 26.80% return.

QOWZ

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: -1.20%
• 1Y: -0.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.27%

VFLO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.89%
• 6M: 26.51%
• YTD: 26.80%
• 1Y: 46.76%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF	$51.96K	$49.43K	$74.07K
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	$86.49M	$72.10M	$51.24M

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF	-1.20%	7.24%	33.16%	5.69%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	26.80%	17.51%	21.83%	5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QOWZ and VFLO is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.62

The correlation between QOWZ and VFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QOWZ	VFLO
Technology	65.3%	30.4%
Industrials	12.1%	0.0%
Healthcare	10.7%	21.6%
Communication Services	8.3%	4.4%
Financial Services	5.5%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	7.0%
Energy	-	22.6%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

QOWZ vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QOWZ

QOWZ Risk / Return Rank: 9
QOWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QOWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
QOWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8
QOWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
QOWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 96
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QOWZ	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	2.94	-3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	4.10	-4.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.52	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	7.03	-7.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	23.62	-23.91

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QOWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QOWZ and VFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QOWZ	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.36%	-17.79%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.81%	-6.44%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.96%	-0.96%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-2.43%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.45%	1.91%	+5.54%

Volatility

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) have volatilities of 3.94% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QOWZ	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	4.11%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	12.12%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	15.64%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	15.98%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	15.98%	+3.11%

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QOWZ and VFLO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

QOWZ vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than VFLO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF	0.25%	0.28%	0.66%	0.00%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.07%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QOWZ and VFLO in my portfolio?

QOWZ and VFLO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QOWZ or VFLO?

VFLO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to QOWZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs VFLO's -17.79%.

Which ETF is better, QOWZ or VFLO?

On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 46.76% vs -0.39% for QOWZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, QOWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QOWZ or VFLO?

Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 46.76% return vs -0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QOWZ or VFLO?

QOWZ and VFLO have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QOWZ or VFLO?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.25% for QOWZ.

What is the main difference between QOWZ and VFLO?

QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VFLO is Large Cap Value Equities. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.