QOWZ vs. IAI
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IAI is a Financials Equities fund tracking the DJ US Select / Investment Services. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned 2.83% vs 16.52% for IAI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IAI.
Performance
QOWZ vs. IAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than IAI's 0.24% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAI
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.46%
QOWZ vs. IAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -1.71% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 6.47% |
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 0.24% | 25.80% | 34.37% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and IAI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QOWZ and IAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
QOWZ vs. IAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QOWZ
IAI
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QOWZ
IAI
Industrials
QOWZ
IAI
-
Healthcare
QOWZ
IAI
-
Communication Services
QOWZ
IAI
-
Financial Services
QOWZ
IAI
Consumer Cyclical
QOWZ
IAI
-
Consumer Defensive
QOWZ
IAI
-
Basic Materials
QOWZ
-
IAI
-
Energy
QOWZ
-
IAI
-
Real Estate
QOWZ
-
IAI
-
Utilities
QOWZ
-
IAI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. IAI — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
IAI
QOWZ vs. IAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QOWZ | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.16 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.00 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 2.88 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QOWZ | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.87 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.28 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. IAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum IAI drawdown of -75.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and IAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -75.46% | +55.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -16.52% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -5.57% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -22.66% | +18.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 5.75% | +0.95% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. IAI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) at 4.48%. This indicates that QOWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.48% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 14.92% | -2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 19.05% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 21.42% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 22.84% | -3.57% |
QOWZ vs. IAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IAI's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. IAI - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than IAI's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 1.08% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.80% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.31% |
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and IAI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QOWZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to IAI (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs IAI's -75.46%.
On 1-year performance, IAI leads with 16.52% vs 2.83% for QOWZ. On fees, QOWZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IAI has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAI has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QOWZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IAI.
IAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.26% for QOWZ.
QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IAI is Financials Equities. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IAI tracks DJ US Select / Investment Services. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.41% for IAI.
IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and IAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer