IAI vs. FAS
IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IAI is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index, while FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAI returned 19.81%/yr vs 22.50%/yr for FAS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IAI charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
IAI vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAI achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IAI has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of 19.81%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.50% annualized return.
IAI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.81%
FAS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
IAI vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 4.12% | 25.80% | 34.37% | 15.27% | -10.87% | 40.48% | 18.61% | 24.26% | -9.47% | 28.86% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -10.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAI and FAS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IAI and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IAI vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAI
FAS
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAI
FAS
Technology
IAI
FAS
Basic Materials
IAI
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
IAI
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAI
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
IAI
-
FAS
-
Energy
IAI
-
FAS
-
Healthcare
IAI
-
FAS
-
Industrials
IAI
-
FAS
Real Estate
IAI
-
FAS
-
Utilities
IAI
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAI vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
IAI
FAS
IAI vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAI | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.13 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 0.30 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAI vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAI drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAI and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAI | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.46% | -91.61% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.52% | -40.88% | +24.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -43.10% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -66.88% | +38.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | -85.99% | +45.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -17.88% | +15.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -31.10% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 18.17% | -12.37% |
Volatility
IAI vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) is 5.64%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that IAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAI | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 12.26% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 33.44% | -18.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 43.36% | -24.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 55.35% | -33.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 61.18% | -38.43% |
IAI vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAI vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
IAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FAS's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.32% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 1.10% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.80% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAI and FAS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAS has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to IAI (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAI dropped -75.46% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 22.50% vs 19.81% for IAI. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 22.50% return vs 19.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.10% for IAI.
IAI is categorized as Financials Equities, while FAS is Leveraged Equities. IAI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index, while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IAI and 1.00% for FAS.
IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAI and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer