QNXT vs. QB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QNXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QNXT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

QNXT vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly higher than QB's 10.47% return.

QNXT

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.67%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNXT vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	15.67%	5.52%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and QB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.67

QNXT vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QNXT	QB
Technology	40.3%	49.9%
Consumer Cyclical	17.0%	12.5%
Industrials	10.6%	3.7%
Communication Services	8.8%	16.4%
Healthcare	7.5%	5.3%
Utilities	6.1%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	8.6%
Energy	2.7%	0.6%
Financial Services	1.0%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.3%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

QNXT vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT

QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 49
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QNXT	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNXT	QB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	3.17	-2.27

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNXT	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-1.83%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.30%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-0.34%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNXT	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	5.75%	+9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	5.75%	+13.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	5.75%	+13.98%

QNXT vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QNXT vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than QB's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%	0.00%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNXT and QB in my portfolio?

QNXT and QB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QNXT or QB?

On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNXT or QB?

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNXT or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.

What is the main difference between QNXT and QB?

QNXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QNXT and 0.58% for QB.