QNXT vs. OUSA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QNXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while OUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QNXT returned 21.16% vs 10.34% for OUSA. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QNXT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.

Performance

QNXT vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 0.48% return.

QNXT

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 12.44%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 21.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OUSA

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: -0.06%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNXT vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	12.44%	14.97%	-2.58%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	0.48%	10.23%	-1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and OUSA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	0.63

The correlation between QNXT and OUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

QNXT vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QNXT	OUSA
Technology	45.3%	26.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	12.7%
Industrials	9.7%	11.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	6.8%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	7.3%
Utilities	5.4%	-
Energy	2.3%	-
Financial Services	0.8%	18.0%
Real Estate	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

QNXT vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT

QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 41
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 44

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 29
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QNXT	OUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.06	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.60	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.19	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.24	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.69	4.37	+2.32

QNXT vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNXT and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and OUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNXT	OUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-33.12%	+10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-8.36%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-3.14%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-3.52%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.37%	+0.80%

Volatility

QNXT vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 2.92%. This indicates that QNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QNXT	OUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	2.92%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	7.42%	+4.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	9.82%	+6.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	13.31%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.94%	15.17%	+4.77%

QNXT vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

QNXT vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than OUSA's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.43%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	0.67%	0.64%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNXT and OUSA in my portfolio?

QNXT and OUSA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QNXT or OUSA?

QNXT has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to OUSA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QNXT dropped -22.25% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

Which ETF is better, QNXT or OUSA?

On 1-year performance, QNXT leads with 21.16% vs 10.34% for OUSA. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QNXT or OUSA?

Over the 1-year period, QNXT has performed better with a 21.16% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNXT or OUSA?

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNXT or OUSA?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.67% for QNXT.

What is the main difference between QNXT and OUSA?

QNXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OUSA is Large Cap Growth Equities. QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QNXT and 0.48% for OUSA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.