PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNXT vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNXT vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNXT vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
-4.65%14.97%-2.52%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
-6.23%22.19%5.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNXT achieves a -4.65% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -6.23% return.


QNXT

1D
2.43%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
-4.65%
6M
-5.48%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTOP

1D
3.75%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
-6.23%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QNXT vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QNXT and QTOP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QNXT vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNXTQTOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.14

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

1.74

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.07

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

7.14

-3.57

QNXT vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNXT and QTOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNXTQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.14

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.63

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and QTOP is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QNXT vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than QTOP's 0.42% yield.


TTM20252024
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.72%0.64%0.22%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.42%0.38%0.11%

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, roughly equal to the maximum QTOP drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and QTOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNXTQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.25%

-23.28%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-12.88%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-9.61%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.11%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.74%

-0.33%

Volatility

QNXT vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) is 5.71%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that QNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNXTQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

7.13%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

13.85%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

23.49%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

23.12%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

23.12%

-2.82%