QMNNX vs. KBUF
QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N) and KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both funds - QMNNX is a Equity Market Neutral fund managed by AQR Funds, while KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. Over the past year, QMNNX returned 3.33% vs -3.13% for KBUF. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. QMNNX charges 5.28%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KBUF.
Performance
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -11.47% return.
QMNNX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 16.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.01%
KBUF
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- -11.47%
- 6M
- -11.63%
- 1Y
- -3.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N | -5.98% | 26.19% | 18.55% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -11.47% | 18.04% | 16.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMNNX and KBUF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMNNX vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank
QMNNX
KBUF
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMNNX | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | -0.24 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | -0.25 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.97 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | -0.18 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | -0.42 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMNNX | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | -0.24 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than KBUF's maximum drawdown of -17.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and KBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMNNX | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.22% | -17.01% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -17.01% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -16.70% | +10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -4.16% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 7.50% | -3.89% |
Volatility
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) is 2.81%, while KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that QMNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMNNX | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 6.22% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.26% | 10.53% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.74% | 13.10% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.40% | 14.35% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 14.35% | -6.05% |
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMNNX has a 5.28% expense ratio, which is higher than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMNNX vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison
QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than KBUF's 8.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.49% | 7.51% | 3.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N | 1.34% | 1.26% | 6.06% | 21.67% | 5.77% | 1.41% | 17.64% | 3.86% | 0.49% | 3.37% | 1.19% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMNNX and KBUF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBUF has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QMNNX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs KBUF's -17.01%.
QMNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMNNX and KBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer