QMNNX vs. EIC
QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N) is Equity Market Neutral fund managed by AQR Funds, while EIC (Eagle Point Income Company Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QMNNX returned 17.23%/yr vs 4.74%/yr for EIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
QMNNX vs. EIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than EIC's -3.07% return.
QMNNX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -3.10%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
EIC
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- -9.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- —
QMNNX vs. EIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N | -5.25% | 26.19% | 25.43% | 16.30% | 27.07% | 17.38% | -19.79% | -4.31% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | -3.07% | -15.28% | 24.02% | 20.86% | -10.48% | 28.01% | -14.41% | -0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMNNX and EIC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMNNX vs. EIC — Risk / Return Rank
QMNNX
EIC
QMNNX vs. EIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMNNX | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -0.48 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | -0.54 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.93 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.36 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | -0.68 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMNNX | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.48 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.84 | 0.24 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.07 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
QMNNX vs. EIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, smaller than the maximum EIC drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and EIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMNNX | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.22% | -67.08% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -28.67% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.41% | -34.06% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.98% | -34.06% | +20.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -23.31% | +17.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -12.25% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 15.27% | -11.68% |
Volatility
QMNNX vs. EIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) is 2.67%, while Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that QMNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMNNX | EIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 5.01% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.21% | 13.91% | -8.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.71% | 20.07% | -13.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 20.19% | -10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 37.49% | -29.19% |
Dividends
QMNNX vs. EIC - Dividend Comparison
QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than EIC's 14.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 14.60% | 17.35% | 15.44% | 13.59% | 11.03% | 7.78% | 10.39% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N | 1.32% | 1.26% | 6.06% | 21.67% | 5.77% | 1.41% | 17.64% | 3.86% | 0.49% | 3.37% | 1.19% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMNNX and EIC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIC has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to QMNNX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs EIC's -67.08%.
QMNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMNNX and EIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer