KBUF vs. KLIP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).

KBUF and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBUF is an actively managed fund by KraneShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2024. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.

Performance

KBUF vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KBUF vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-8.06%	18.04%	16.58%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-8.98%	16.92%	10.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -8.06% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.

KBUF

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: -8.06%
• 6M: -12.68%
• 1Y: 0.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLIP

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -12.63%
• 1Y: -1.25%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KBUF and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

KBUF

KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF

KLIP

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

KBUF vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF

KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 12
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 12

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 11
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KBUF	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	-0.06	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	0.05	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.01	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	-0.08	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	-0.26	+0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KBUF vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KBUF	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	-0.06	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.35	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and KLIP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KBUF vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, less than KLIP's 28.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	8.17%	7.51%	3.53%	0.00%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	28.24%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBUF	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.55%	-18.61%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-17.23%	+2.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.49%	-14.21%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-3.34%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	5.18%	-0.34%

Volatility

KBUF vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 4.63%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBUF	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	7.16%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	13.48%	-4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	19.76%	-6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.08%	18.19%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.08%	18.19%	-4.11%