KBUF vs. KPRO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both Options Trading funds from KraneShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBUF returned -6.32% vs -3.83% for KPRO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

KBUF vs. KPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -12.82% return, which is significantly lower than KPRO's -5.24% return.

KBUF

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: -16.85%
• YTD: -12.82%
• 1Y: -6.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KPRO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: -7.05%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 1Y: -3.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. KPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-12.82%	18.04%	15.85%
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-5.24%	7.79%	11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and KPRO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.91

The correlation between KBUF and KPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KBUF vs. KPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF

KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

KPRO

KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. KPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBUF	KPRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.44	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	-0.47	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.92	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	-0.29	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	-0.53	-0.13

KBUF vs. KPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the KPRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and KPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. KPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than KPRO's maximum drawdown of -13.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KPRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBUF	KPRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-13.34%	-7.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.14%	-13.34%	-7.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.97%	-12.03%	-5.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-2.82%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.63%	7.21%	+2.42%

Volatility

KBUF vs. KPRO - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) at 1.20%. This indicates that KBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBUF	KPRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	1.20%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	4.75%	+5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	8.85%	+4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	7.71%	+6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	7.71%	+6.51%

KBUF vs. KPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KBUF and KPRO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

KBUF vs. KPRO - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than KPRO's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	8.62%	7.51%	3.53%
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	2.80%	2.65%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBUF and KPRO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, KBUF and KPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KBUF or KPRO?

KBUF has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to KPRO (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -21.14% vs KPRO's -13.34%.

Which ETF is better, KBUF or KPRO?

On 1-year performance, KPRO leads with -3.83% vs -6.32% for KBUF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, KPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBUF or KPRO?

Over the 1-year period, KPRO has performed better with a -3.83% return vs -6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBUF or KPRO?

KBUF and KPRO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBUF or KPRO?

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 2.80% for KPRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.