QMNNX vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both funds - QMNNX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AQR, while CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QMNNX returned 18.24%/yr vs -1.67%/yr for CCOR. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QMNNX charges 1.62%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's 0.43% return.

QMNNX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: -3.21%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 17.30%
• 5Y*: 18.24%
• 10Y*: 5.90%
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

CCOR

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: -3.08%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 1Y: -1.08%
• 3Y*: -0.82%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.54K	$68.15K	$77.63K
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	-6.23%	26.19%	25.43%	16.30%	27.07%	17.38%	-19.79%	-11.55%	-11.94%	5.92%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.43%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	4.07%	6.03%	4.64%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNNX and CCOR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.16
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.01

The correlation between QMNNX and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMNNX vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMNNX

QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 18
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMNNX	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	-0.12	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	-0.11	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.99	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	-0.11	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	-0.23	+1.37

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNNX and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMNNX	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.22%	-22.99%	-16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.96%	-8.79%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.96%	-12.31%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.98%	-22.99%	+9.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-16.59%	+9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-7.47%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	4.18%	+0.58%

Volatility

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) is 2.61%, while Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that QMNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMNNX	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	3.61%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.65%	6.45%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.00%	8.20%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.30%	11.19%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.35%	10.78%	-2.43%

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNNX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMNNX vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than CCOR's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	1.34%	1.26%	6.06%	21.67%	5.77%	1.41%	17.64%	3.86%	0.49%	3.37%	1.19%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMNNX and CCOR in my portfolio?

QMNNX and CCOR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMNNX or CCOR?

CCOR has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QMNNX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.