Correlation
The correlation between KBUF and KWEB is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
KBUF vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
KBUF and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBUF is an actively managed fund by KraneShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2024. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBUF or KWEB.
Performance
KBUF vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
KBUF:
0.85
KWEB:
0.33
KBUF:
1.34
KWEB:
0.77
KBUF:
1.16
KWEB:
1.10
KBUF:
1.62
KWEB:
0.18
KBUF:
3.57
KWEB:
0.94
KBUF:
3.78%
KWEB:
14.29%
KBUF:
15.88%
KWEB:
41.96%
KBUF:
-8.33%
KWEB:
-80.92%
KBUF:
-3.21%
KWEB:
-64.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's 11.97% return.
KBUF
7.32%
0.30%
8.71%
14.27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
KWEB
11.97%
1.87%
9.95%
15.97%
5.75%
-6.76%
-0.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBUF vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBUF vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KBUF
KWEB
KBUF vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
KBUF vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than KWEB's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 3.29% | 3.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 3.13% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
KBUF vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KWEB.
Loading data...
Volatility
KBUF vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 3.76%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...