QMNNX vs. GDMA

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QMNNX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both funds - QMNNX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AQR Funds, while GDMA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Gadsden. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QMNNX returned 17.60%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for GDMA. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMNNX charges 1.62%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.

Performance

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 8.50% return.

QMNNX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: -5.47%
• YTD: -7.95%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 17.60%
• 10Y*: 5.78%

GDMA

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.77%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	-7.95%	26.19%	25.43%	16.30%	27.07%	17.38%	-19.79%	-11.55%	1.25%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	8.50%	25.29%	7.44%	1.72%	-2.08%	3.95%	21.08%	11.59%	-3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNNX and GDMA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018	0.04

The correlation between QMNNX and GDMA shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMNNX vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNNX

QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 7
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 54
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMNNX	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.40	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	1.87	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.27	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	2.94	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	7.26	-6.54

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNNX and GDMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and GDMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMNNX	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.22%	-16.66%	-22.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.96%	-7.53%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.96%	-7.53%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.98%	-12.74%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.33%	-5.01%	-3.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-3.78%	-6.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	3.04%	+1.41%

Volatility

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) is 2.28%, while Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that QMNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMNNX	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	7.42%	-5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.40%	13.19%	-7.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.76%	15.76%	-9.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.30%	10.34%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.32%	11.41%	-3.09%

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNNX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMNNX vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than GDMA's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.57%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMNNX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N	1.36%	1.26%	6.06%	21.67%	5.77%	1.41%	17.64%	3.86%	0.49%	3.37%	1.19%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMNNX and GDMA in my portfolio?

QMNNX and GDMA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMNNX or GDMA?

GDMA has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to QMNNX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs GDMA's -16.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.