QLYS vs. TENB
QLYS (Qualys, Inc.) and TENB (Tenable Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, QLYS returned 7.34%/yr vs -5.28%/yr for TENB. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
QLYS vs. TENB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLYS achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than TENB's 38.72% return.
QLYS
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.72%
TENB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -15.44%
- 6M
- 47.96%
- YTD
- 38.72%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- -12.78%
- 5Y*
- -5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | $105.16M | $113.24M | $96.03M |
| $133.93M | $141.79M | $112.21M |
QLYS vs. TENB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 8.92% | -5.22% | -28.56% | 74.89% | -18.21% | 12.60% | 46.18% | 11.55% | -22.79% |
TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 38.72% | -40.25% | -14.50% | 20.73% | -30.72% | 5.38% | 118.11% | 7.98% | -32.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLYS and TENB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between QLYS and TENB shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QLYS:
$5.10B
TENB:
$3.60B
QLYS:
$5.59
TENB:
$0.06
QLYS:
25.90
TENB:
572.34
QLYS:
7.62
TENB:
3.70
QLYS:
9.06
TENB:
19.04
QLYS:
$684.86M
TENB:
$1.04B
QLYS:
$569.03M
TENB:
$814.49M
QLYS:
$252.31M
TENB:
$84.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLYS vs. TENB — Risk / Return Rank
QLYS
TENB
QLYS vs. TENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) and Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLYS | TENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.09 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 0.18 | +0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLYS vs. TENB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLYS drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, smaller than the maximum TENB drawdown of -74.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLYS and TENB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLYS | TENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -74.40% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.46% | -48.52% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.99% | -69.09% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.99% | -74.40% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.70% | -47.91% | +18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -31.30% | +10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.16% | 23.45% | +0.71% |
Volatility
QLYS vs. TENB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) is 18.08%, while Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) has a volatility of 20.07%. This indicates that QLYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLYS | TENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.08% | 20.07% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.71% | 46.60% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.43% | 51.09% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.83% | 45.73% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.56% | 48.46% | -8.90% |
Dividends
QLYS vs. TENB - Dividend Comparison
Neither QLYS nor TENB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QLYS vs. TENB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qualys, Inc. and Tenable Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QLYS vs. TENB - Profitability Comparison
QLYS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.65M and revenue of 175.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.9%.
TENB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 208.18M and revenue of 268.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
QLYS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.89M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.
TENB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.92M and revenue of 268.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
QLYS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a net income of 50.64M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
TENB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 3.81M and revenue of 268.51M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QLYS and TENB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TENB has higher volatility (20.07%) compared to QLYS (18.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLYS dropped -68.48% vs TENB's -74.40%.
QLYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLYS and TENB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer