QLYS vs. COST
QLYS (Qualys, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. QLYS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, QLYS returned 14.09%/yr vs 21.98%/yr for COST. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QLYS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLYS achieves a -15.48% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, QLYS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.09%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 21.98% annualized return.
QLYS
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- -15.48%
- 6M
- -19.23%
- 1Y
- -19.98%
- 3Y*
- -3.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
COST
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- -4.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.98%
QLYS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | -15.48% | -5.22% | -28.56% | 74.89% | -18.21% | 12.60% | 46.18% | 11.55% | 25.93% | 87.52% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 11.37% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLYS and COST is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between QLYS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QLYS:
$5.57
COST:
$26.51
QLYS:
20.16
COST:
36.13
QLYS:
0.61
COST:
2.82
QLYS:
5.93
COST:
1.09
QLYS:
$684.86M
COST:
$293.59B
QLYS:
$569.03M
COST:
$11.12B
QLYS:
$252.31M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLYS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
QLYS
COST
QLYS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLYS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.98 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.28 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | -0.61 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLYS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLYS drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLYS and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLYS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -53.39% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.46% | -14.93% | -35.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.99% | -20.74% | -42.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.99% | -31.40% | -31.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.99% | -31.40% | -31.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.44% | -12.49% | -32.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -13.36% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.68% | 6.90% | +17.78% |
Volatility
QLYS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.38%. This indicates that QLYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLYS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.30% | 6.38% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.52% | 14.49% | +22.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.62% | 18.93% | +26.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 22.73% | +17.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.07% | 21.97% | +17.10% |
Dividends
QLYS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
QLYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
QLYS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qualys, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QLYS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
QLYS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.65M and revenue of 175.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.9%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
QLYS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.89M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
QLYS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a net income of 50.64M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QLYS and COST have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLYS has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to COST (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLYS dropped -68.48% vs COST's -53.39%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLYS and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer