PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENB vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TENB vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENB achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -14.39% return.


TENB

1D
5.39%
1M
45.55%
YTD
31.32%
6M
16.69%
1Y
-4.04%
3Y*
-8.80%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*

PLTR

1D
-5.28%
1M
5.62%
YTD
-14.39%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
118.84%
5Y*
45.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENB vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
31.32%-40.25%-14.50%20.73%-30.72%5.38%38.44%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-14.39%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%147.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TENB and PLTR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020

0.40

The correlation between TENB and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TENB:

$3.64B

PLTR:

$391.22B

EPS

TENB:

-$0.10

PLTR:

$0.89

PS Ratio

TENB:

3.61

PLTR:

74.78

PB Ratio

TENB:

14.65

PLTR:

46.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

TENB:

$1.02B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TENB:

$799.18M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

TENB:

$101.15M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENB vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TENB
TENB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TENB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TENB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TENB vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TENBPLTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

0.30

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

0.74

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.09

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.41

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

0.76

-0.90

TENB vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TENB Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TENB and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENBPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

0.30

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.69

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.91

-0.90

Drawdowns

TENB vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENB drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENB and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENBPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.40%

-84.62%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.77%

-38.19%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-40.61%

-28.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.40%

-79.14%

+4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.69%

-26.55%

-24.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-40.31%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.63%

20.30%

+9.33%

Volatility

TENB vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) have volatilities of 17.60% and 17.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENBPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.60%

17.05%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.92%

37.73%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

51.27%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.33%

65.36%

-21.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

69.82%

-22.02%

Dividends

TENB vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TENB nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TENB vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
262.06M
1.63B
(TENB) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TENB vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%86.0%20222023202420252026
78.4%
86.8%
Portfolio components
TENB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 205.39M and revenue of 262.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

TENB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.76M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

TENB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TENB and PLTR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TENB has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to PLTR (17.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TENB dropped -74.40% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENB and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer