PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENB vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TENB vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENB achieves a 26.18% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return.


TENB

1D
-3.92%
1M
42.53%
YTD
26.18%
6M
10.74%
1Y
-9.32%
3Y*
-10.01%
5Y*
-6.60%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-3.17%
1M
3.54%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-6.96%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENB vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
26.18%-40.25%-14.50%20.73%-30.72%5.38%118.11%7.98%-26.64%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.24%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TENB and MSFT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.47

The correlation between TENB and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TENB:

$3.49B

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

TENB:

-$0.10

MSFT:

$16.79

PS Ratio

TENB:

3.47

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

TENB:

14.08

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

TENB:

$1.02B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TENB:

$799.18M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TENB:

$101.15M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENB vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TENB
TENB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TENB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TENB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TENB vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TENBMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

-0.28

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.01

-0.21

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.97

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.21

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.31

-0.44

+0.12

TENB vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TENB Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is comparable to the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TENB and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENBMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

-0.28

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.46

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.75

-0.75

Drawdowns

TENB vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENB drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENB and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENBMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.40%

-69.38%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.77%

-33.91%

-20.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-33.91%

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.40%

-37.15%

-37.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.62%

-20.67%

-31.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-21.78%

-9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.65%

15.95%

+13.70%

Volatility

TENB vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) has a higher volatility of 18.17% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that TENB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENBMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.17%

9.95%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.12%

22.34%

+16.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.78%

25.12%

+18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.36%

26.63%

+17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.81%

27.04%

+20.77%

Dividends

TENB vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

TENB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TENB vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
262.06M
82.89B
(TENB) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TENB vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
78.4%
67.6%
Portfolio components
TENB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 205.39M and revenue of 262.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TENB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.76M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

TENB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TENB and MSFT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TENB has higher volatility (18.17%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TENB dropped -74.40% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

TENB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENB and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer