PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TENB vs. FTNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TENB vs. FTNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENB achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTNT's 87.46% return.


TENB

1D
5.39%
1M
45.55%
YTD
31.32%
6M
16.69%
1Y
-4.04%
3Y*
-8.80%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*

FTNT

1D
1.17%
1M
72.51%
YTD
87.46%
6M
79.48%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
29.76%
5Y*
28.15%
10Y*
35.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENB vs. FTNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
31.32%-40.25%-14.50%20.73%-30.72%5.38%118.11%7.98%-26.64%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
87.46%-15.95%61.42%19.72%-31.98%141.97%39.13%51.58%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TENB and FTNT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.56

The correlation between TENB and FTNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TENB:

$3.64B

FTNT:

$110.57B

EPS

TENB:

-$0.10

FTNT:

$2.58

PS Ratio

TENB:

3.61

FTNT:

15.89

PB Ratio

TENB:

14.65

FTNT:

111.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

TENB:

$1.02B

FTNT:

$7.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TENB:

$799.18M

FTNT:

$5.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

TENB:

$101.15M

FTNT:

$2.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TENB vs. FTNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TENB
TENB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TENB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TENB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FTNT
FTNT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FTNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTNT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FTNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTNT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TENB vs. FTNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TENBFTNTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

1.02

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.51

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

1.50

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

2.20

-2.33

TENB vs. FTNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TENB Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the FTNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TENB and FTNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TENBFTNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

1.02

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.65

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.75

-0.75

Drawdowns

TENB vs. FTNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENB drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, which is greater than FTNT's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENB and FTNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TENBFTNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.40%

-51.20%

-23.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.77%

-30.90%

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-38.32%

-30.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.40%

-38.32%

-36.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.69%

0.00%

-50.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-16.25%

-14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.63%

21.06%

+8.57%

Volatility

TENB vs. FTNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) is 17.60%, while Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) has a volatility of 20.23%. This indicates that TENB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TENBFTNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.60%

20.23%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.92%

31.53%

+7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

44.78%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.33%

43.87%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

40.84%

+6.96%

Dividends

TENB vs. FTNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TENB nor FTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TENB vs. FTNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
262.06M
1.85B
(TENB) Total Revenue
(FTNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TENB vs. FTNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tenable Holdings, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%20222023202420252026
78.4%
80.3%
Portfolio components
TENB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 205.39M and revenue of 262.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

FTNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.

TENB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.76M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

FTNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported an operating income of 580.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

TENB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tenable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41M and revenue of 262.06M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

FTNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a net income of 534.50M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TENB and FTNT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTNT has higher volatility (20.23%) compared to TENB (17.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TENB dropped -74.40% vs FTNT's -51.20%.

FTNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TENB and FTNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer