QLYS vs. CRWD
QLYS (Qualys, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, QLYS returned 7.34%/yr vs 24.66%/yr for CRWD. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
QLYS vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLYS achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 62.86% return.
QLYS
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.72%
CRWD
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 72.96%
- YTD
- 62.86%
- 1Y
- 70.92%
- 3Y*
- 66.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 41.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.40B | $1.60B | $2.05B | |
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | $105.16M | $113.24M | $96.03M |
QLYS vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 8.92% | -5.22% | -28.56% | 74.89% | -18.21% | 12.60% | 46.18% | -3.20% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 62.86% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLYS and CRWD is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.50 |
The correlation between QLYS and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QLYS:
$5.10B
CRWD:
$194.34B
QLYS:
$5.59
CRWD:
-$0.02
QLYS:
7.62
CRWD:
9.58
QLYS:
9.06
CRWD:
10.62
QLYS:
$684.86M
CRWD:
$5.09B
QLYS:
$569.03M
CRWD:
$3.82B
QLYS:
$252.31M
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLYS vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
QLYS
CRWD
QLYS vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLYS | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.84 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 4.40 | -4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLYS vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLYS drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLYS and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLYS | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -67.69% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.46% | -37.18% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.99% | -44.44% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.99% | -67.69% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.70% | -9.43% | -20.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -23.33% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.16% | 15.49% | +8.67% |
Volatility
QLYS vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) has a higher volatility of 18.08% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) at 16.39%. This indicates that QLYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLYS | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.08% | 16.39% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.71% | 39.70% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.43% | 47.78% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.83% | 51.09% | -10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.56% | 55.97% | -16.41% |
Dividends
QLYS vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither QLYS nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QLYS vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qualys, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QLYS vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
QLYS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.65M and revenue of 175.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.9%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
QLYS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.89M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
QLYS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qualys, Inc. reported a net income of 50.64M and revenue of 175.64M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QLYS and CRWD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLYS has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to CRWD (16.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLYS dropped -68.48% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLYS and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer