QLVD vs. TDTT
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and TDTT (FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QLVD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while TDTT is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 5.83%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for TDTT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TDTT.
Performance
QLVD vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than TDTT's 1.81% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- —
TDTT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
QLVD vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.66% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.35% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.81% | 6.67% | 3.96% | 4.40% | -4.58% | 5.49% | 6.84% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and TDTT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
TDTT
QLVD vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLVD | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.51 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 5.17 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 16.59 | -14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLVD | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.54 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.78 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.69 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and TDTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -6.97% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -0.90% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -1.53% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -6.97% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -0.14% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -1.60% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 0.28% | +2.46% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) at 0.46%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | TDTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 0.46% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 1.21% | +7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 1.85% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 3.67% | +8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 3.38% | +10.59% |
QLVD vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than TDTT's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than TDTT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.78% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.54% | 4.52% | 4.01% | 3.88% | 6.97% | 4.53% | 1.15% | 1.91% | 2.48% | 1.88% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and TDTT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to TDTT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs TDTT's -6.97%.
On 5-year performance, QLVD leads with 5.83% vs 2.85% for TDTT. On fees, TDTT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTT has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLVD has performed better with a 5.83% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDTT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.78% for QLVD.
QLVD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while TDTT is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.18% for TDTT.
TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and TDTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer