QLV vs. VFMV
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).
QLV and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLV is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2019. VFMV is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
QLV vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLV vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 0.10% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.55% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 5.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.55% return.
QLV
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLV vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QLV vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
QLV
VFMV
QLV vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 0.90 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.87 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 4.02 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.79 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLV and VFMV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLV vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.60% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
QLV vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and VFMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -33.64% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -9.63% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -15.41% | -2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -4.59% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -3.69% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.07% | -0.19% |
Volatility
QLV vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 3.18%, while Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.44% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.81% | 6.62% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 12.31% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 11.77% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 14.35% | +2.40% |