PortfoliosLab logo
QLV vs. VMVFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and VMVFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QLV vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QLV:

0.75

VMVFX:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

QLV:

1.25

VMVFX:

1.27

Omega Ratio

QLV:

1.19

VMVFX:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

QLV:

0.96

VMVFX:

1.28

Martin Ratio

QLV:

4.23

VMVFX:

4.44

Ulcer Index

QLV:

2.73%

VMVFX:

2.29%

Daily Std Dev

QLV:

13.71%

VMVFX:

11.30%

Max Drawdown

QLV:

-33.71%

VMVFX:

-33.09%

Current Drawdown

QLV:

-1.82%

VMVFX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 6.89% return.


QLV

YTD

2.20%

1M

4.29%

6M

0.45%

1Y

10.24%

5Y*

14.09%

10Y*

N/A

VMVFX

YTD

6.89%

1M

3.33%

6M

3.05%

1Y

9.66%

5Y*

8.96%

10Y*

6.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLV vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QLV vs. VMVFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLV is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLV is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLV is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLV is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLV is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLV is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VMVFX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VMVFX is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VMVFX is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VMVFX is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VMVFX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VMVFX is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QLV vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and VMVFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QLV vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than VMVFX's 3.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.71%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
3.52%3.77%3.05%4.96%3.42%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%6.19%

Drawdowns

QLV vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum VMVFX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and VMVFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QLV vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 3.25%. This indicates that QLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...