PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QLV vs. XRLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and XRLV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

QLV vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.79%
4.36%
QLV
XRLV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QLV:

1.76

XRLV:

1.14

Sortino Ratio

QLV:

2.39

XRLV:

1.62

Omega Ratio

QLV:

1.32

XRLV:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

QLV:

3.12

XRLV:

1.25

Martin Ratio

QLV:

9.91

XRLV:

4.74

Ulcer Index

QLV:

1.62%

XRLV:

2.20%

Daily Std Dev

QLV:

9.14%

XRLV:

9.15%

Max Drawdown

QLV:

-33.71%

XRLV:

-38.31%

Current Drawdown

QLV:

-5.15%

XRLV:

-8.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly higher than XRLV's -2.22% return.


QLV

YTD

-1.26%

1M

-4.40%

6M

1.79%

1Y

15.59%

5Y*

10.37%

10Y*

N/A

XRLV

YTD

-2.22%

1M

-4.76%

6M

4.36%

1Y

10.95%

5Y*

6.79%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLV vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XRLV
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
Expense ratio chart for XRLV: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for QLV: current value at 0.22% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.22%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QLV vs. XRLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLV is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLV is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLV is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLV is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLV is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLV is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XRLV is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XRLV is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XRLV is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XRLV is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XRLV is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XRLV is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QLV vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QLV, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.761.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for QLV, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.391.62
The chart of Omega ratio for QLV, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for QLV, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.121.25
The chart of Martin ratio for QLV, currently valued at 9.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.914.74
QLV
XRLV

The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the XRLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and XRLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.76
1.14
QLV
XRLV

Dividends

QLV vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than XRLV's 1.99% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.68%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.97%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.99%1.94%2.56%1.96%1.26%1.66%1.66%1.76%1.40%1.71%1.07%

Drawdowns

QLV vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum XRLV drawdown of -38.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and XRLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.15%
-8.38%
QLV
XRLV

Volatility

QLV vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 3.09%, while Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.09%
3.29%
QLV
XRLV
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab