QLFNX vs. NLSIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLFNX charges 6.55%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.

Performance

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than NLSIX's 1.94% return.

QLFNX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NLSIX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: 7.56%
• 5Y*: 5.52%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N	0.17%	6.71%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	1.94%	-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and NLSIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLFNX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.95	-0.12

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, roughly equal to the maximum NLSIX drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and NLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLFNX	NLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.54%	-14.75%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.79%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.97%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-2.01%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLFNX	NLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.88%	4.93%	+10.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	6.66%	+9.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	7.32%	+8.56%

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N	0.14%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLFNX and NLSIX in my portfolio?

QLFNX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.