PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFNX vs. NLSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-13.14%6.71%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
-3.63%-0.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -13.14% return, which is significantly lower than NLSIX's -3.63% return.


QLFNX

1D
0.38%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NLSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-3.63%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
6.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLFNX

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFNXNLSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.22

0.91

-2.12

Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and NLSIX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.16%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, roughly equal to the maximum NLSIX drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and NLSIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFNXNLSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-14.75%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.22%

-4.39%

-9.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-2.03%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

Volatility

QLFNX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLFNXNLSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

6.34%

+9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

6.63%

+9.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

7.29%

+8.36%