QLFNX vs. QHFIX
QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) and QHFIX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR, while QHFIX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLFNX charges 6.55%/yr vs 6.69%/yr for QHFIX.
Performance
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than QHFIX's 0.76% return.
QLFNX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFIX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | -1.91% | 6.71% |
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 0.76% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLFNX and QHFIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, roughly equal to the maximum QHFIX drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QHFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLFNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -13.85% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -3.09% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -4.88% | -0.63% |
Volatility
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLFNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 17.00% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 17.00% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 17.00% | -0.38% |
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFIX's 6.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLFNX vs. QHFIX - Dividend Comparison
QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while QHFIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLFNX and QHFIX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QLFNX and QHFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer