QLFNX vs. QCFNX
QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) and QCFNX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR, while QCFNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLFNX charges 6.55%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for QCFNX.
Performance
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than QCFNX's 14.88% return.
QLFNX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCFNX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | -1.91% | 6.71% |
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 14.88% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLFNX and QCFNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, which is greater than QCFNX's maximum drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QCFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLFNX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -8.02% | -6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -3.04% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -1.70% | -3.81% |
Volatility
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLFNX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 15.13% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 15.13% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 15.13% | +1.49% |
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison
QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QCFNX's 6.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 6.72% | 7.72% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLFNX and QCFNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QLFNX and QCFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer