PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFNX vs. QCFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than QCFNX's 14.88% return.


QLFNX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.20%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
-2.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCFNX

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
14.88%
6M
14.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-1.91%6.71%
QCFNX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N
14.88%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and QCFNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, which is greater than QCFNX's maximum drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QCFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFNXQCFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-8.02%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-3.04%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-1.70%

-3.81%

Volatility

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFNXQCFNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

15.13%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

15.13%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

15.13%

+1.49%

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFNX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QCFNX's 6.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QCFNX
AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N
6.72%7.72%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.14%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLFNX and QCFNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFNX and QCFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer