QLEIX vs. JAKVX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX).

QLEIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2013. JAKVX is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Apr 11, 2014.

Performance

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	-2.98%	22.36%
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	5.90%	17.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 5.90% return.

QLEIX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -2.98%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 19.47%
• 3Y*: 26.66%
• 5Y*: 22.56%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

JAKVX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.

JAKVX

John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6

QLEIX

AQR Long-Short Equity Fund

Return for Risk

QLEIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLEIX

QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLEIX	JAKVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLEIX	JAKVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	3.68	-2.57

Correlation

The correlation between QLEIX and JAKVX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison

QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than JAKVX's 8.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	1.81%	1.75%	7.12%	20.88%	14.15%	0.00%	1.57%	0.00%	6.03%	9.11%	3.01%	4.98%
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	8.00%	8.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QLEIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and JAKVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLEIX	JAKVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.11%	-5.16%	-32.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-3.40%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-0.81%	-6.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLEIX	JAKVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.61%	7.24%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.22%	7.24%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.55%	7.24%	+3.31%