QLEIX vs. BIVRX
QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) and BIVRX (Invenomic Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, QLEIX returned 22.74%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for BIVRX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLEIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for BIVRX.
Performance
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly higher than BIVRX's -8.01% return.
QLEIX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
BIVRX
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- -2.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- —
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -1.51% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 31.10% | -13.92% | 1.19% | -16.33% | 8.52% |
BIVRX Invenomic Fund | -8.01% | 4.39% | -9.03% | 16.47% | 49.61% | 44.06% | 11.12% | 11.36% | 3.41% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLEIX and BIVRX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between QLEIX and BIVRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLEIX vs. BIVRX — Risk / Return Rank
QLEIX
BIVRX
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLEIX | BIVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.99 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | -0.21 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | -0.57 | +6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than BIVRX's maximum drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and BIVRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLEIX | BIVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.11% | -27.37% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -26.97% | +20.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.07% | -27.37% | +20.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.07% | -27.37% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -14.20% | +12.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -6.19% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 9.84% | -7.76% |
Volatility
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) is 3.30%, while Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that QLEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLEIX | BIVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 17.27% | -13.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.24% | 25.96% | -19.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.72% | 29.73% | -22.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 19.06% | -9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 18.45% | -7.89% |
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVRX's 2.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Dividend Comparison
QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than BIVRX's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVRX Invenomic Fund | 2.10% | 1.93% | 3.55% | 20.26% | 28.43% | 3.00% | 3.11% | 3.21% | 4.82% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.78% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLEIX and BIVRX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVRX has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to QLEIX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLEIX dropped -38.11% vs BIVRX's -27.37%.
QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLEIX and BIVRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer