PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLEIX vs. BIVRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly higher than BIVRX's -8.01% return.


QLEIX

1D
1.31%
1M
-0.67%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-1.51%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
22.74%
10Y*
11.72%

BIVRX

1D
-1.18%
1M
5.77%
6M
-5.00%
YTD
-8.01%
1Y
-4.65%
3Y*
-2.48%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
-1.51%34.43%30.50%23.95%19.18%31.10%-13.92%1.19%-16.33%8.52%
BIVRX
Invenomic Fund
-8.01%4.39%-9.03%16.47%49.61%44.06%11.12%11.36%3.41%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QLEIX and BIVRX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.20

The correlation between QLEIX and BIVRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLEIX vs. BIVRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BIVRX
BIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLEIXBIVRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.99

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

-0.21

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

-0.57

+6.98

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BIVRX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLEIX and BIVRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than BIVRX's maximum drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and BIVRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLEIXBIVRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.11%

-27.37%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-26.97%

+20.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-27.37%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

-27.37%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-14.20%

+12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-6.19%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

9.84%

-7.76%

Volatility

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) is 3.30%, while Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that QLEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLEIXBIVRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

17.27%

-13.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

25.96%

-19.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

29.73%

-22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.03%

19.06%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

18.45%

-7.89%

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVRX's 2.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLEIX vs. BIVRX - Dividend Comparison

QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than BIVRX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIVRX
Invenomic Fund
2.10%1.93%3.55%20.26%28.43%3.00%3.11%3.21%4.82%1.21%0.00%0.00%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.78%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLEIX and BIVRX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIVRX has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to QLEIX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLEIX dropped -38.11% vs BIVRX's -27.37%.

QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLEIX and BIVRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer