QLEIX vs. QLENX
QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N) are both Long-Short funds from AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLEIX returned 12.00%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for QLENX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLEIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for QLENX.
Performance
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's -0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QLEIX having a 12.00% annualized return and QLENX not far behind at 11.72%.
QLEIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
QLENX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 25.60%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -0.71% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 31.10% | -13.92% | 1.19% | -16.33% | 15.74% |
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N | -0.83% | 34.07% | 30.18% | 23.67% | 18.92% | 30.70% | -14.18% | 1.01% | -16.64% | 15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLEIX and QLENX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 1.00 |
The correlation between QLEIX and QLENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLEIX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank
QLEIX
QLENX
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLEIX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.45 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.87 | 7.54 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, roughly equal to the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and QLENX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLEIX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.11% | -38.50% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -6.09% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.07% | -7.09% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.07% | -17.19% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -38.50% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.45% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -7.46% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.97% | -0.04% |
Volatility
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLEIX | QLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.85% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 5.78% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.37% | 7.40% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 10.01% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 10.59% | 0.00% |
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLEIX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison
QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than QLENX's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.76% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N | 1.65% | 1.64% | 7.13% | 21.21% | 14.09% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 6.09% | 8.91% | 2.87% | 4.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QLEIX and QLENX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QLENX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to QLEIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLEIX dropped -38.11% vs QLENX's -38.50%.
QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLEIX and QLENX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer