PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLEIX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, QLEIX has outperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.97% annualized return.


QLEIX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.63%
6M
1.63%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
11.73%

PRPFX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.17%
6M
-2.57%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.97%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
0.43%34.43%30.50%23.95%19.18%31.10%-13.92%1.19%-16.33%15.74%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
2.08%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QLEIX and PRPFX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLEIX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLEIXPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.60

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

3.56

+3.98

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLEIX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLEIXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.11%

-27.16%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-9.74%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-9.74%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

-15.49%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-20.84%

-17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-8.67%

+8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-3.54%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

4.35%

-2.25%

Volatility

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that QLEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLEIXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.42%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

10.97%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

13.09%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.03%

11.12%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

10.68%

-0.08%

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLEIX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than PRPFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
3.20%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.74%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLEIX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLEIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to PRPFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLEIX dropped -38.11% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLEIX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer