QLEIX vs. PRPFX

In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, QLEIX has outperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLEIX and PRPFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than PRPFX's 1.68% yield.

The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -42.90%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -31.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and PRPFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) is 1.37%, while Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that QLEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.