JAKVX vs. RLSIX
JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) and RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, JAKVX returned 20.32% vs 4.15% for RLSIX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAKVX charges 1.54%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for RLSIX.
Performance
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than RLSIX's -4.14% return.
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLSIX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- -5.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 9.88% | 17.29% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -4.14% | 15.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAKVX and RLSIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAKVX vs. RLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
JAKVX
RLSIX
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAKVX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.08 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 0.32 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.15 | 0.92 | +12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum RLSIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and RLSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAKVX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -60.82% | +55.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -14.56% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -28.92% | +25.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -15.13% | +14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 5.10% | -3.55% |
Volatility
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) is 2.82%, while RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that JAKVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAKVX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 4.65% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 9.92% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.79% | 12.19% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 24.98% | -17.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 21.58% | -14.03% |
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than RLSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAKVX vs. RLSIX - Dividend Comparison
JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, while RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.71% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAKVX and RLSIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLSIX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to JAKVX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs RLSIX's -60.82%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAKVX and RLSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer