PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAKVX vs. ALLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than ALLW's 7.06% return.


JAKVX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.46%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALLW

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
7.06%
6M
6.75%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAKVX and ALLW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.59

The correlation between JAKVX and ALLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAKVX vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAKVXALLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.64

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

10.61

+2.21

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAKVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAKVX and ALLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum ALLW drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and ALLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAKVXALLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-8.78%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-7.23%

+2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

-2.74%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-1.25%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.80%

-0.27%

Volatility

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) is 2.81%, while State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that JAKVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAKVXALLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.88%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.33%

9.30%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.78%

11.02%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

12.69%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.56%

12.69%

-5.13%

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAKVX vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than ALLW's 4.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JAKVX and ALLW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLW has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to JAKVX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs ALLW's -8.78%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAKVX and ALLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer