QLD vs. SPYD
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 35.67%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for SPYD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
QLD vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 35.67%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 73.89%
- 3Y*
- 44.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.24%
- 10Y*
- 35.67%
SPYD
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
QLD vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 32.65% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 14.73% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -1.17% | 32.73% | -11.64% | 21.20% | -4.89% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and SPYD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QLD and SPYD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QLD vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLD
SPYD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QLD
SPYD
Communication Services
QLD
SPYD
Consumer Cyclical
QLD
SPYD
Consumer Defensive
QLD
SPYD
Healthcare
QLD
SPYD
Industrials
QLD
SPYD
Utilities
QLD
SPYD
Basic Materials
QLD
SPYD
Energy
QLD
SPYD
Financial Services
QLD
SPYD
Real Estate
QLD
SPYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
SPYD
QLD vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.80 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 8.14 | +1.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLD vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -46.42% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -7.05% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -16.13% | -26.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -22.25% | -41.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -46.42% | -17.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | 0.00% | -7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -6.15% | -12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 2.42% | +4.94% |
Volatility
QLD vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.92%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 2.92% | +12.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.51% | 7.74% | +19.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.29% | 11.70% | +22.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 16.15% | +28.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 19.78% | +24.95% |
QLD vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLD vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPYD's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.05% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLD and SPYD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to SPYD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs SPYD's -46.42%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 35.67% vs 9.09% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 35.67% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.07% for SPYD.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer