QLD vs. ROM
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%) while ROM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 36.17%/yr vs 42.99%/yr for ROM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QLD vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.81% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 81.36% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 36.17%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 42.99% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 21.71%
- YTD
- 42.81%
- 6M
- 38.79%
- 1Y
- 89.44%
- 3Y*
- 50.42%
- 5Y*
- 26.76%
- 10Y*
- 36.17%
ROM
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 48.54%
- YTD
- 81.36%
- 6M
- 78.65%
- 1Y
- 164.67%
- 3Y*
- 60.32%
- 5Y*
- 33.27%
- 10Y*
- 42.99%
QLD vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.81% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 81.36% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and ROM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QLD and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLD vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLD
ROM
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QLD
ROM
Communication Services
QLD
ROM
-
Consumer Cyclical
QLD
ROM
-
Consumer Defensive
QLD
ROM
-
Healthcare
QLD
ROM
-
Industrials
QLD
ROM
Utilities
QLD
ROM
-
Basic Materials
QLD
ROM
-
Energy
QLD
ROM
Financial Services
QLD
ROM
Real Estate
QLD
ROM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
ROM
QLD vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 3.97 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 3.87 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.51 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 5.24 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.83 | 16.06 | -3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 3.97 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.54 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -83.36% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -32.33% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -48.10% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -67.55% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -67.55% | +3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -20.88% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 10.55% | -3.35% |
Volatility
QLD vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 8.87%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 13.54% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 33.27% | -9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 41.78% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 51.63% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.57% | 49.82% | -5.25% |
QLD vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QLD and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QLD vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ROM's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QLD and ROM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ROM has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to QLD (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs ROM's -83.36%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.99% vs 36.17% for QLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.99% return vs 36.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLD and ROM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%).
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer