QLD vs. ROM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM).
QLD and ROM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. Both QLD and ROM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QLD vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLD vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | -16.84% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a -13.35% return, which is significantly higher than ROM's -16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 29.40%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 31.73% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
ROM
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -16.84%
- 6M
- -15.35%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 31.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLD vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QLD and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
ROM
QLD vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.48 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 4.42 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.29 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.64 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and ROM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLD vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ROM's 0.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and ROM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -83.36% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -32.33% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -67.55% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -67.55% | +3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.10% | -26.67% | +6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -21.02% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.67% | 10.81% | -3.14% |
Volatility
QLD vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 12.96%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 16.01%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 16.01% | -3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.55% | 32.95% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.91% | 53.78% | -8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 51.32% | -6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.47% | 49.50% | -5.03% |