QLD vs. ROM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM).
QLD and ROM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. ROM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. Both QLD and ROM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QLD or ROM.
Key characteristics
| QLD | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.74% | 4.46% |
| 1Y Return | 67.51% | 64.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.48% | 8.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 26.78% | 28.45% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 29.98% | 31.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.34 | 1.98 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.70% | 35.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.13% | -83.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.76% | -16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and ROM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QLD vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than ROM's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 29.98%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 31.76% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLD vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QLD and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QLD vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QLD vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than ROM's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.38% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.19% | 0.13% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% | 0.24% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and ROM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QLD vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 10.35%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.