PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 36.10%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively lower 24.77% annualized return.


QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
19.82%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and SPUU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.89

The correlation between QLD and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
SPUU

Technology

53.8%
16.5%

Communication Services

15.8%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.6%

Industrials

2.8%
3.3%

Utilities

1.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.7%

Energy

0.6%
1.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.8%

Technology

QLD
53.8%
SPUU
16.5%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
SPUU
2.0%

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
SPUU
3.3%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
SPUU
1.1%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
SPUU
0.7%

Energy

QLD
0.6%
SPUU
1.4%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
SPUU
4.8%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
SPUU
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.96

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

13.06

-1.15

QLD vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.26

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.61

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

QLD vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-59.35%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-18.19%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-35.18%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-46.59%

-17.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-59.35%

-4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.27%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-9.51%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

4.12%

+3.08%

Volatility

QLD vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

5.71%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

18.09%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

23.90%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.74%

33.46%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.56%

35.77%

+8.79%

QLD vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QLD and SPUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 24.77% for SPUU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 24.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.64% for SPUU.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer