QLD vs. SCHD
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 35.67%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QLD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 35.67%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.91% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 69.43%
- 3Y*
- 44.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.24%
- 10Y*
- 35.67%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
QLD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 32.65% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and SCHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QLD and SCHD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QLD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLD
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QLD
SCHD
Communication Services
QLD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
QLD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
QLD
SCHD
Healthcare
QLD
SCHD
Industrials
QLD
SCHD
Utilities
QLD
SCHD
Basic Materials
QLD
SCHD
Energy
QLD
SCHD
Financial Services
QLD
SCHD
Real Estate
QLD
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
SCHD
QLD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 5.70 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 13.97 | -4.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -33.37% | -49.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -4.61% | -20.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -16.13% | -26.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -16.85% | -46.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -33.37% | -30.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -0.03% | -7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -3.31% | -14.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 1.89% | +5.47% |
Volatility
QLD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 3.05% | +12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.51% | 7.53% | +19.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.29% | 10.93% | +23.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 14.38% | +30.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 16.72% | +28.01% |
QLD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 35.67% vs 12.91% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 35.67% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer