QLD vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QLD is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, QLD returned 85.49% vs 6074.28% for MULL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

QLD vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	-1.61%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and MULL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.62

The correlation between QLD and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLD	MULL
Technology	53.8%	66.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QLD vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLD	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	46.71	-44.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	7.02	-3.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.89	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	116.34	-112.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.92	390.40	-378.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLD vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLD	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	46.71	-44.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	7.45	-6.85

Drawdowns

QLD vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-72.29%	-10.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-53.09%	+27.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-20.62%	+2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	15.79%	-8.59%

Volatility

QLD vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 8.90%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLD	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.90%	55.41%	-46.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.08%	105.59%	-81.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	132.38%	-100.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.74%	136.22%	-91.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.56%	136.22%	-91.66%

QLD vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLD vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and MULL in my portfolio?

QLD and MULL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLD or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, QLD or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 85.49% for QLD. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLD or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 85.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLD or MULL?

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLD or MULL?

QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between QLD and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.