PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MULL vs. XXXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MULL vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MULL vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
40.10%558.51%-40.10%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
-21.85%17.36%-10.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 40.10% return, which is significantly higher than XXXX's -21.85% return.


MULL

1D
18.15%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
40.10%
6M
196.67%
1Y
845.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XXXX

1D
2.83%
1M
-19.38%
YTD
-21.85%
6M
-22.09%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MULL vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MULL vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MULL vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MULLXXXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.53

0.29

+6.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

0.91

+2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.14

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

16.69

0.52

+16.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.83

1.80

+45.03

MULL vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MULL Sharpe Ratio is 6.53, which is higher than the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MULL and XXXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MULLXXXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53

0.29

+6.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

0.43

+1.48

Correlation

The correlation between MULL and XXXX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MULL vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

MULL vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than XXXX's maximum drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and XXXX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MULLXXXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.29%

-62.27%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

-43.00%

-10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.05%

-28.09%

-10.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.99%

-12.06%

-9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

12.33%

+6.59%

Volatility

MULL vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 47.87% compared to MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) at 21.30%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MULLXXXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.87%

21.30%

+26.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.70%

37.79%

+61.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.90%

72.27%

+58.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.06%

61.75%

+68.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.06%

61.75%

+68.31%