QLD vs. FSPCX
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and FSPCX (Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio) are both funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while FSPCX is a Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 35.67%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for FSPCX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FSPCX.
Performance
QLD vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSPCX's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed FSPCX with an annualized return of 35.67%, while FSPCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
QLD
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 73.89%
- 3Y*
- 44.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.24%
- 10Y*
- 35.67%
FSPCX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- -0.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
QLD vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 32.65% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio | -0.79% | 3.45% | 28.44% | 12.98% | 7.75% | 29.26% | 0.00% | 30.06% | -11.99% | 15.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and FSPCX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.56 |
The correlation between QLD and FSPCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
FSPCX
QLD vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLD | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.01 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | -0.03 | +9.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLD vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than FSPCX's maximum drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and FSPCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -69.48% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -9.98% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -11.69% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -16.65% | -47.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -43.68% | -20.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -5.50% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -9.70% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.36% | 4.98% | +2.38% |
Volatility
QLD vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) at 5.74%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | FSPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 5.74% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.51% | 11.31% | +16.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.29% | 15.53% | +18.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 17.59% | +27.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 20.12% | +24.61% |
QLD vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLD vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FSPCX's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPCX Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio | 4.74% | 3.35% | 8.72% | 8.48% | 0.74% | 8.40% | 8.80% | 6.90% | 32.69% | 12.52% | 2.81% | 3.11% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLD and FSPCX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to FSPCX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and FSPCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer