QLD vs. BRKL
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QLD is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.35 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
QLD vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QLD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 32.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.68%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $408.78M | $399.91M | $439.78M |
QLD vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -10.17% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and BRKL is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLD vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLD | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLD vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -7.03% | -76.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.72% | -0.13% | -16.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -4.14% | -13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | — | — |
Volatility
QLD vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.62% | 30.99% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 30.99% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.97% | 30.99% | +13.98% |
QLD vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLD vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLD and BRKL have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.
QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for QLD and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer