BRKL vs. BULZ
BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) and BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BRKL is actively managed, while BULZ is passively managed. Their -0.47 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BRKL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.
Performance
BRKL vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BULZ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -17.83%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 74.21%
- 3Y*
- 52.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $23.90M | $29.65M | $44.16M |
BRKL vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs | -22.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKL and BULZ is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKL vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BULZ
BRKL vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRKL | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRKL vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKL and BULZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKL | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -94.44% | +87.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -46.29% | +46.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -57.57% | +53.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.42% | — |
Volatility
BRKL vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKL | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 70.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.99% | 85.72% | -54.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 92.08% | -61.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 92.08% | -61.09% |
BRKL vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRKL vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRKL nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKL and BULZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.
BRKL and BULZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BRKL and 0.95% for BULZ.
Find the right allocation for BRKL and BULZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer