QLC vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLC returned 14.83%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

QLC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, QLC has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.83%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

QLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 15.29%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	11.39%	23.26%	26.71%	26.02%	-17.21%	28.46%	13.64%	24.51%	-8.12%	21.73%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and SCHG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015	0.82

The correlation between QLC and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	SCHG
Technology	34.8%	46.3%
Financial Services	13.8%	6.7%
Communication Services	13.8%	16.0%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	12.7%
Industrials	6.6%	5.8%
Utilities	3.4%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.4%
Energy	2.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 81
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLC	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.60	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.18	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.28	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	1.51	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.59	5.04	+12.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLC vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLC	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.60	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.70	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.87	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.84	-0.05

Drawdowns

QLC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-34.59%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-16.41%	+7.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-23.39%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-34.59%	+10.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	-34.59%	-1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.78%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-5.20%	+0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	4.90%	-3.01%

Volatility

QLC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) is 2.94%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that QLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	3.61%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	11.62%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	15.50%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	22.27%	-5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	21.55%	-3.13%

QLC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QLC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.88%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QLC and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLC or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QLC (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.77% vs 14.83% for QLC. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or SCHG?

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between QLC and SCHG?

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.