QLC vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. QLC is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QLC returned 24.47%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for BDGS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

QLC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.84% return.

QLC

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 14.84%
• 10Y*: 14.50%

BDGS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	9.23%	23.26%	26.71%	17.81%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.84%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and BDGS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.78

The correlation between QLC and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	BDGS
Technology	34.8%	37.4%
Financial Services	13.8%	9.3%
Communication Services	13.8%	16.6%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	10.9%
Industrials	6.6%	6.6%
Utilities	3.4%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.5%
Energy	2.0%	2.6%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 78
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 75
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.24	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.32	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	3.39	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.39	16.03	+0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLC vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.24	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.72	-0.93

Drawdowns

QLC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-9.12%	-26.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-4.03%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-9.12%	-9.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-1.57%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-0.65%	-3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.85%	+1.04%

Volatility

QLC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.29%. This indicates that QLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	1.29%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	4.80%	+5.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.67%	6.12%	+6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	8.21%	+8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	8.21%	+10.22%

QLC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.89%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and BDGS in my portfolio?

QLC and BDGS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLC or BDGS?

QLC has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BDGS (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, QLC leads with 24.47% vs 13.76% for BDGS. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, QLC has performed better with a 24.47% return vs 13.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or BDGS?

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or BDGS?

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between QLC and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.