QLC vs. BKLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while BKLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLC returned 15.29%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for BKLC. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.

Performance

QLC vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QLC having a 11.39% return and BKLC slightly lower at 10.93%.

QLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 15.29%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

BKLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 10.81%
• 1Y: 28.05%
• 3Y*: 23.25%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	11.39%	23.26%	26.71%	26.02%	-17.21%	28.46%	33.45%
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF	10.93%	18.06%	25.56%	30.88%	-20.52%	27.41%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and BKLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020	0.97

The correlation between QLC and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	BKLC
Technology	34.8%	38.0%
Financial Services	13.8%	10.9%
Communication Services	13.8%	10.8%
Healthcare	10.1%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	9.8%
Industrials	6.6%	7.8%
Utilities	3.4%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.7%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.6%
Energy	2.0%	3.3%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 81
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BKLC

BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 68
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLC	BKLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.33	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.15	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.42	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.10	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.59	14.15	+3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLC vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLC	BKLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.33	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.84	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.12	-0.33

Drawdowns

QLC vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and BKLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	BKLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-26.14%	-9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-9.10%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-19.05%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-26.14%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.74%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-5.27%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.99%	-0.10%

Volatility

QLC vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) have volatilities of 2.94% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	BKLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	3.00%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	9.12%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	12.11%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.16%	-0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	17.44%	+0.98%

QLC vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QLC vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than BKLC's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF	1.01%	1.05%	1.22%	1.35%	1.64%	1.10%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.88%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and BKLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, QLC and BKLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLC or BKLC?

BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to QLC (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or BKLC?

On 5-year performance, QLC leads with 15.29% vs 14.33% for BKLC. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or BKLC?

Over the 5-year period, QLC has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or BKLC?

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or BKLC?

BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.88% for QLC.

What is the main difference between QLC and BKLC?

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BKLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.00% for BKLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.