QINT vs. MID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while MID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century. QINT is passively managed, while MID is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 8.94%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for MID. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MID.

Performance

QINT vs. MID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than MID's 2.25% return.

QINT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: —

MID

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 13.39%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. MID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	8.57%	38.12%	6.53%	20.36%	-19.75%	9.29%	18.46%
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF	2.25%	8.22%	19.40%	22.20%	-27.44%	10.39%	30.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and MID is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020	0.67

The correlation between QINT and MID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

QINT vs. MID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QINT	MID
Financial Services	19.7%	6.1%
Industrials	18.9%	25.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	12.2%
Technology	10.0%	21.9%
Healthcare	9.9%	18.7%
Basic Materials	9.7%	2.3%
Energy	5.8%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	1.6%
Communication Services	4.5%	-
Utilities	1.5%	4.4%
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

QINT vs. MID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT

QINT Risk / Return Rank: 51
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

MID

MID Risk / Return Rank: 12
MID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MID Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MID Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MID Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MID Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. MID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QINT	MID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.23	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	0.44	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.05	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	0.29	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	0.85	+8.10

QINT vs. MID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the MID Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and MID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QINT vs. MID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, smaller than the maximum MID drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and MID.

Drawdown Indicators

	QINT	MID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-40.15%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-13.89%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.56%	-23.92%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	-40.15%	+6.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-3.74%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-13.34%	+5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	4.73%	-1.90%

Volatility

QINT vs. MID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 5.26%, while American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QINT	MID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	6.68%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	13.88%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	17.45%	-2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	23.72%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	23.93%	-5.85%

QINT vs. MID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MID's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QINT vs. MID - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than MID's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.17%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	3.81%	2.66%	3.49%	3.12%	3.56%	2.30%	1.61%	1.83%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QINT and MID in my portfolio?

QINT and MID have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QINT or MID?

MID has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to QINT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs MID's -40.15%.

Which ETF is better, QINT or MID?

On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 8.94% vs 3.85% for MID. On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QINT or MID?

Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 8.94% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QINT or MID?

QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QINT or MID?

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.18% for MID.

What is the main difference between QINT and MID?

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.45% for MID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.