QINT vs. JQUA
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 9.64%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for JQUA. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
QINT vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.
QINT
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.79M | $28.22M | $36.46M | |
| $2.00M | $2.83M | $3.27M |
QINT vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 11.64% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.95% | 23.46% | -14.13% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.93% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and JQUA is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QINT and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
JQUA
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
JQUA
Industrials
QINT
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
JQUA
Healthcare
QINT
JQUA
Technology
QINT
JQUA
Basic Materials
QINT
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
QINT
JQUA
Energy
QINT
JQUA
Communication Services
QINT
JQUA
Utilities
QINT
JQUA
Real Estate
QINT
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
JQUA
QINT vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QINT | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.95 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 12.05 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QINT vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, roughly equal to the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -32.92% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -7.13% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -16.81% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -22.47% | -11.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.36% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -4.10% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 1.74% | +1.08% |
Volatility
QINT vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.34%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 2.34% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 9.47% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 12.04% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 15.72% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.93% | +0.11% |
QINT vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than JQUA's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.43% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QINT and JQUA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QINT has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.89% vs 9.64% for QINT. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.08% for JQUA.
QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.12% for JQUA.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer