PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QINT vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QINT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.


QINT

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
8.57%
6M
8.11%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
8.57%38.12%6.53%6.25%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.94%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and IBID is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.07

The correlation between QINT and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QINT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QINTIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.72

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

7.20

-4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

29.14

-20.19

QINT vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QINT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QINTIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-1.28%

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-0.55%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.55%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-0.22%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

0.13%

+2.70%

Volatility

QINT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QINTIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

0.35%

+4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

0.86%

+12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

1.23%

+14.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

2.24%

+14.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

2.24%

+15.84%

QINT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QINT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
3.81%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QINT and IBID have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QINT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, QINT leads with 25.26% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QINT has performed better with a 25.26% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

QINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QINT and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer