QINT vs. GMOI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QINT tracks the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index while GMOI tracks the MSCI World ex USA Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QINT returned 25.26% vs 35.21% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.

Performance

QINT vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.52% return.

QINT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 25.26%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: —

GMOI

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 11.19%
• 1Y: 35.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QINT vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	8.57%	38.12%	-3.96%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	11.52%	45.64%	-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QINT and GMOI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.89

The correlation between QINT and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QINT vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QINT

QINT Risk / Return Rank: 51
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 85
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QINT vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QINT	GMOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.64	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	3.65	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.47	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	4.23	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	16.65	-7.70

QINT vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QINT and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QINT vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and GMOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QINT	GMOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-14.67%	-19.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-8.36%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-2.63%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-1.69%	-5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.12%	+0.71%

Volatility

QINT vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.99%. This indicates that QINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QINT	GMOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	3.99%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	10.67%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	13.40%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	15.57%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	15.57%	+2.51%

QINT vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QINT vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than GMOI's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.45%	2.74%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF	3.81%	2.66%	3.49%	3.12%	3.56%	2.30%	1.61%	1.83%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QINT and GMOI in my portfolio?

QINT and GMOI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QINT or GMOI?

QINT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to GMOI (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

Which ETF is better, QINT or GMOI?

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 35.21% vs 25.26% for QINT. On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QINT or GMOI?

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 35.21% return vs 25.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QINT or GMOI?

QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QINT or GMOI?

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.45% for GMOI.

What is the main difference between QINT and GMOI?

QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: American Century and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.60% for GMOI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.